Language Change questions:
What are the main causes for language change?
Technology,
migration, political like wars, trade, work and urbanisation, popular culture,
globalisation/travel, religion, gender, science and technology, transport and
communication.
What are the ways in which language changes?
Semantic
shifts and narrowing, broadening, euphemism and cliché, lexical changes like
borrowing, affixation, compounds, blends and jargon, pragmatics of the
implication of language become shared knowledge, spellings being irregular,
discourse of how the text is laid out in relation to purpose and audience,
phonetics like accents, dialect, vowel shift and Estuary English and finally
graphology looking at fonts, images, colours and layouts for formality, moods and
feelings and how to capture the audience’s attention.
What are the key influential factors on the development of the English as accessible to all?
The
invention of the printing press by William Caxton so therefore a mass audience
for texts, Samuel Johnsons OE dictionary,
Prescriptive and descriptive attitudes, the need for Standard English,
the increase in the written word, the idea of disintegration by Robert Burchfield (1978), the invention of
the internet and it being able to be quickly updated like news articles.
What is the difference between prescriptive and
descriptive attitude to language use?
Prescriptive
– wants language to stay standard and keep grammar and punctuation the same. It
rejects non-standard terms like slang. Language change is seen as decay for
language. “ [Prescriptivism is the] policy of describing languages
as we would like them to be, rather than as we find them. Typical examples of
prescriptivist attitudes are the condemnation of preposition stranding and of
the split infinitive and a demand for It's I in place of the normal It's
me."
Descriptive
– where language changes without a judgement and recognises the importance of a
standard and a non-standard form. It is part of how language changes and is
worth studying wherever it is used. Supported by David Crystal and him saying:
“you can’t go into a garden and say that one flower is better that the other”
What did Johnson think his problems were with his dictionary? Are these problems still evident in dictionaries today?
What did Johnson think his problems were with his dictionary? Are these problems still evident in dictionaries today?
The
problems with his dictionary is that even though he tried to keep the
prescriptive approach is in idea to “fix” the English Language, it couldn’t
keep up with the ever changing use of lexis and semantics (the nature of the
language itself). Dictionaries defiantly going through the same problems today
as language is changing every year. However, they are more accepting of this
and try to include as many new words as possible which have become popular and
even non-standard like selfie and vape.
What is a “lingua franca” and to what extent was/is
English one?
Definition
from the OED: A language that is adopted as a common language between speakers whose native languages are different.
To
some extent this is true as the English has many word borrowed from languages
around the world like Latin and French, countries that used to belong to the
empire, however from the beginning it started as basic anglo-saxon and lots of
conquering has developed the English Language ever since. English has a West
Germanic language.
What are the prestigious forms of English now?
They are known as covert and
overt and are linked to dialects. Overt prestige is when a dialect is widely
recognised as being used by a culturally dominated group like RP for England.
Covert is when a dialect is used by a culturally known group but is seen as
inferior and is used to belong to a community like the idea of “street cred”.
How has politically correct language and the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis influenced modern English usages?
Political Correctness - a term used to
describe language, ideas, policies, or behavior seen as seeking to minimize
offence to gender, racial, cultural, disabled, aged or other identity groups.
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis - the theory that an individual's thoughts and
actions are determined by the language or languages that individual speaks.
These
two things are interlinked and are influential because they seem to control
language use and if thoughts or actions are negative then they should be
corrected. Example: you can’t sing “baa baa black sheep” anymore due to racist
connotations. There are some suggested that could be taken too far but in the
past you could consider this idea as important for the English language as it
helped to improve social progress.
Three examples of obsolete English grammar that you can make a reference to in the exam.
1.
"Thou", "thee", "thine" and "thy" -
pronouns that have dropped out of the main dialects of Modern English.
2. “Start’d” – contractions to show the past
3. Use of
the medial s in words
Find three features of modern
punctuation that take advantage of a lessening of prescriptivism.
1.'In order to protect your computer, you should do
the following: run a trustworthy anti-virus system such as AVG and keep
it updated.' - colon usage
2.The use of multiple '?!' as expression and shock
3. ':-)' use of punctuation to create faces
and expression
Find three neologisms from the past five years.
Find three neologisms from the past five years.
Oversharers, digital detox and tweet cred
Do an internet search to find an article that interests you on language uses. Find a key quote to memorize. How does that writer communicate their ideas?
“This is not the first time this has happened in history but certainly the increase in the pace of change has resulted in our language changing equally rapidly, and with it, our thoughts.” – From http://theconversation.com/how-technology-is-changing-language-and-the-way-we-think-about-the-world-35856.The author uses technology as an example for how language has changed over time and affected ho we know language today.
Read at least one chapter from a book
from a library about language change; identify how the attitudes expressed in
it are a product of when it was written.
'Language Change' by Adrian Beard. Page 49-51 - Text Messaging. Published in 2004.
Descriptive. - Although gives examples of how it would be prescriptive. Doesn't seem to take sides. 'emoticons are the sketch of imagination, iconic representations of an action or emotion'. There are reasons for the conventions; the limit of words, 60 characters, to be playful and inventive, privacy - silly, sexual, informative. 'ideal for criminals, stalkers and bullies'. When text language is used in a GCSE exam, is it really wrong? Should it be marked as incorrect? If people can understand what is meant, and that’s how people in reality speak, why should it be any different in an exam?
'Language Change' by Adrian Beard. Page 49-51 - Text Messaging. Published in 2004.
Descriptive. - Although gives examples of how it would be prescriptive. Doesn't seem to take sides. 'emoticons are the sketch of imagination, iconic representations of an action or emotion'. There are reasons for the conventions; the limit of words, 60 characters, to be playful and inventive, privacy - silly, sexual, informative. 'ideal for criminals, stalkers and bullies'. When text language is used in a GCSE exam, is it really wrong? Should it be marked as incorrect? If people can understand what is meant, and that’s how people in reality speak, why should it be any different in an exam?
What does gender theory reveal about English use
through the ages?
Stereotypical language use for females has changed e.g lots of adjectives and attributes that make women seem inferior and looked down on by men have been challenged and made women as equal as men. Also, language that women could use has changed. For example in Tudor times women weren’t allowed to use colloquial and offensive terms against men whereas today they can.
Stereotypical language use for females has changed e.g lots of adjectives and attributes that make women seem inferior and looked down on by men have been challenged and made women as equal as men. Also, language that women could use has changed. For example in Tudor times women weren’t allowed to use colloquial and offensive terms against men whereas today they can.
No comments:
Post a Comment